There are alternatives!
Renewables and energy saving can deliver more carbon savings than nuclear
Neil Crumpton, until recently Friends of the Earth’s anti-nuclear campaigner/energy specialist, has produced a “carbon-negative” non-nuclear UK 2050 energy scenario. The proposed infrastructure would have the potential to go beyond low-carbon energy technologies should climate protection policies require it. Neil will soon be employed by the Bellona Foundation to set up a Bellona UK to progress such far-reaching energy and climate solutions.
The route map aims to paint the picture of the likely scale of low-carbon energy generating and transmission infrastructure needed to build a resilient, demand-responsive UK energy system.
Renewables, carbon capture and storage (CCS), heat pumps, urban heat grids, and heat storage, and possibly suburban hydrogen networks fed by coal gasifiers, would be progressively deployed during the four decades of transition.
Offshore windfarms occupying some 20,000 square kilometers, and other marine renewables would supply over half the estimated 2050 energy demand. The energy produced offshore would be several times greater than even two large nuclear power programmes that New Labour is proposing.
CCS-fitted Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plants would supply industrial clusters and district- to city-wide heat grids. The heat grids would facilitate the building of large scale heat storage, large heat pump schemes and solar thermal arrays ,and potentially inter-seasonal heat storage underground. As variable renewable capacity scales up, fast-response aero-derivative turbines and fuel cells would provide power and heat back-up when renewable output was low.
Supergrid electricity links to mainland Europe and to Saharan solar and wind schemes (Desertec Industrial Initiative) would also help ensure renewable energy met the UK's varying daily and seasonal demands. The CCS-fitted CHP infrastructure could be fueled by bio-algae oil or even “solar” ethanol (synthesised from CO2 extracted from desert air) to provide a carbon-negative power output to further reduce dangerous atmospheric CO2 levels.
Such a renewable, load-following, carbon-negative infrastructure is way beyond nuclear power’s limited, lowish carbon, inflexible baseload and offers a far safer, more peaceful and sustainable future for humans and all biodiversity on Earth.